Click Here to Go to the Ashbrook Center's Homepage

Subscribe to Our Email Update
 
SEARCH
 

Home



Support the Ashbrook Center




No Left Turns:
The Ashbrook
Center Blog




  Ashbrook
Podcasts


Podcast Index

What's a Podcast?

Peter Schramm's "You Americans"

Ashbrook Events

Teaching American History




Ashbrook Scholar Program



Social Studies
Teacher Seminars






Congressional Academy for American History and Civics





Presidential Academy for American History and Civics





Master of American History and Government





American Speeches, Letters, and Documents
On-Line Library






Constitutional
Convention


Federalist-
Antifederalist
Debate


Ratification of
the Constitution


Founding
Political Parties




Ashbrook 
Columnists 

Robert Alt

Andrew E. Busch

John C. Eastman

Christopher Flannery

David Forte

Patrick J. Garrity

Steven Hayward

Joseph Knippenberg

Terrence O. Moore

Lucas Morel

Mackubin T. Owens

Peter W. Schramm

David Tucker

John Zvesper




Calendar of Events



Subscribe to Our
E-Mail Update





Book of the Week:
Plato's Philosophers: The Coherence of the Dialogues
by Catherine H. Zuckert




Book of the Week Archive



Vindicating The
Founders.com




Classics of Strategy and Diplomacy



Suggested Articles



Who Was
John Ashbrook?




Other Sites of Interest

Review of Recent News and Commentary
Ashbrook E-Mail Update
April 25, 2002


by Peter W. Schramm

Politics

There is much to do about nothing again from the chattering classes about the difficulties within the Democratic Party in finding a nominee for president. Gore's performance in Florida two weeks ago was not impressive (nor was that of any of the other putative candidates) so there is now talk about McCain running as a Democrat. The New Republic is pushing McCain for president as a Democrat. My view is that McCain (or his overly ambitious staffers) will want to run anyway he can: it will certainly not be as a Republican (he just keeps moving left); he will be unable to do it as an Independent (a la Perot in '92), nor will he be able to do it as a Democrat (because he can't move that far left, and if he tries the Demo base will not believe him). Which means that the Democrats will have to find the least boring leader they have and give him a shot. That candidate will lose in '04, Hillary will become increasingly popular between now and '06, and she will run in the primaries in '08 and will be nominated. In the meantime I note in passing that it is almost certainly the case that Condoleezza Rice will be on the Republican ticket in '08, by then having become Secretary of State, if not Vice President under the second George W. Bush term. The Democrats are hurting.

Here is Robert Kuttner, a liberal, on how everything, oh! just everything, is going conservative nowadays. The once liberal press is now moderate, he claims, and then there is FOX News! Life is rough for Kuttner and his friends, but to some, liberal whine tastes sweet.

The news reports continue, as in this piece from the Washington Post, about how the conservatives are beating up on Bush and the White House for leaning too hard on Israel, not dealing with Arafat as a terrorist, and so on. It strikes me that the conservatives started backing off a few days ago, so this is outdated "news." Now these stories are becoming a cover for Democrats to begin to publicly attack Bush's foreign policy generally (which they have not been able to do until now). See the Senator Lieberman quote at the end of the article. The media is creating an opening that shouldn't be there.

Middle East

Bill Kristol and Robert Kagan of The Weekly Standard now claim that what is the clear result of Powell's trip is that Bush is back on track: Bush is once again upholding the Bush doctrine. Bush is once again supporting anti-terrorist policies, i.e., Israel's. I think they have it backwards. Bush has never been off track. It was The Weekly Standard that got off track for about a week or so and now they are back on the right track. I'm glad. I like those guys. Welcome back. Next time, they should try to distinguish between the President's necessary public rhetoric and what he is really up to: pay attention to what he does, and less to what he says. And on Iraq, give Bush a break. He said there would be a change of regimes. Let Bush set his own timetable. I think this Bush knows what prudence means. In the meantime see a perfectly clear analysis by Benjamin Netanyahu of the connection between tyranny and terrorism, means and ends. "Those who fight as terrorists rule as terrorists." Note that he makes up a new country, "Arafatistan." It's the size of a couple of rooms, with one master and a couple of dozen subjects, and it is surrounded by good guys with big guns. The piece by Mark Steyn is very clear on the difference between fantasy and reality in the Middle East. European anti-Semites take notice. It is powerful. Also note what Eric Hoffer said in 1967; he is quoted in the Steyn article.

This is a revealing interview with Clinton's chief Middle East negotiator, Dennis Ross, on why Arafat turned down the great offer worked out at the last few weeks of the Clinton administration: Arafat would have had to agree to end the conflict, and he could not. Ross said: "For him (Arafat) to end the conflict is to end himself."

The always thoughtful and felicitous Victor Davis Hanson lays out a future in which Europe becomes irrelevant and the day of the Arab tyrant is coming to an end. No one foresaw the fall of communism, and no one foresees the fall of radical Islam. Is that future now?

This is a fine characterization of Sharon as a warrior, how indispensable he is in a crisis, how he will be cast aside when its over, and how peace will be easier because of what he is and what he has done. The comparisons are with Sherman, Patton, Le May and Ajax. Victor Davis Hanson at his best.

And see this by Rich Lowry if you are tempted in any way to bend toward kindness to Saudi Arabia. These people are living in their own world, but reality will catch up and the place will go the way of all other cruel tyrannies soon enough, I predict.

This paean to a suicide bomber is written by a professor of history at Kent State. I find it amazing and shocking. He's a block, a knave, a fool, a villain, and I don't care what his religion is!

Just when you think things are complicated enough there is this AP story on the ever-increasing connection between China and Iran. This will get interesting but only if Iran doesn't begin to topple after Iraq falls.

Culture

That cloning is an important issue goes without saying. It is deeply charged with moral and political significance. This lengthy article by Charles Krauthammer is perhaps the clearest I have read both on what cloning is and how to think about it. As you'll see, it is in two parts.

Ward Connerly has succeeded in getting enough signatures to put a measure on the ballot that would block California and local governments from classifying people by their race. This is good mischief. Fundamental questions will have to be raised in the conversation leading up to the election. Even the UC Berkeley student newspaper, in an editorial, endorses the plan set forward by Connerly. This is progress.

This article by David Brooks on our children's character formation in a society that, although not without problems, has the great virtue of stressing merit, is worth reading. It is arguably too optimistic, but it is thoughtful.

It is a good sign that members of a popular singing group, Destiny's Child, are able to make distinctions between sexy and nasty, both in their demeanor and the content of their songs.

Bill Bennett is calling for Cardinal Bernard Law to be removed, citing canon law. Bennett is right. This is serious.

Europe

The fact that Jean-Marie Le Pen will be in the runoff election in France is another indication (among other things) of an anti-European Union sentiment in many countries now shifting right (including Italy, Spain, and Denmark). Although Le Pen is not a good guy (and he will not be elected president of France) this movement to the right may be a good sign that many sensible Europeans are becoming increasingly skeptical of EU as a socialist super-bureaucracy. This analysis by Christopher Caldwell is the best so far of what Le Pen's good showing may mean and how it came about. Also see this short report on Le Pen and immigration.

The results from the elections in Hungary are not good. The Socialists (former communists) have removed the conservatives from power. Not good news. So far no former communist East European country has been able to elect a non-socialist government back to back.


 


Printer-Friendly Version

Upcoming Events

Michael Burlingame on Abraham Lincoln
Friday, February 19


Recent Publications


Progressive Bigotry and Natural Law by Richard Adams

Advisers, Not Advocates by Mackubin T. Owens

Conservative Malaise? by Julie Ponzi

Are Democrats Deluding Themselves About ’94? by Andrew E. Busch

Making Sense of the Missile Shield Bait and Switch by Rebeccah Heinrichs

Abraham Lincoln on Constitution and Character by Joseph Knippenberg

What Will the Republicans Do? by Andrew E. Busch

What Does Obama Do Next? by Andrew E. Busch

The World Has Changed by Peter W. Schramm

The Conservative Challenge by Charles R. Kesler

Hallowed Ground by Christopher Flannery

Dear Mr. President by Andrew E. Busch

Money for Nothing by Joseph Knippenberg

Bourbon Democrats by Andrew E. Busch

Questions for Symbolic Sotomayor and Roadrunner Republicans by Ken Thomas


Audio Archive


John Kasich on the Future of Ohio (2009)

John Moser on Captain America (2009)

Steven Hayward on Ronald Reagan (2009)

Tim Timken on Private Enterprise (2009)

Sally Pipes on Health Care Reform (2009)

Colleen Sheehan on James Madison (2009)

Robert J. Norrell on Booker T. Washington (2009)

James Piereson on the Kennedy Assassination (2009)

Peter W. Schramm on Abraham Lincoln (2009)

The No Left Turns Bloggers on Election 2008 (2008)

Conference on the Presidency and the Courts featuring President George W. Bush (2008)

Jeb Bush on America’s Promise (2008)

Harry V. Jaffa on the Lincoln-Douglas Debates (2007)

Glenn Beck on Militant Islam (2006)

Lamar Alexander on Education (2006)

Karl Rove on Conservatism (2005)

James McPherson on the Battle of Antietam (2005)

David Hackett Fischer on Liberty and Freedom (2004)

William Bennett on the Politics of War (2004)

Edwin Meese on Homeland Security (2003)

Barbara Bush on CSPAN (2003)

Victor Davis Hanson on Terrorism (2003)

Benjamin Netanyahu on Attaining Peace (2002)

Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court (1999)

Margaret Thatcher on Ronald Reagan and Freedom (1993)

Lynne V. Cheney on Academic Freedom (1992)

Dick Cheney on American Foreign Policy (1991)

Ronald Reagan on John Ashbrook (1983)

  Real Logo
Visit our archive of over 200 other Ashbrook speeches at
audio.ashbrook.org or subscribe to our
Events Podcast.








ASHBROOK SCHOLAR PROGRAM | MASTER OF AMERICAN HISTORY AND GOVERNMENT |
PUBLICATIONS | EVENTS | PODCASTS | NO LEFT TURNS BLOG | AUDIO ARCHIVE | DONATE | ABOUT US

 

Ashbrook Scholar Program:  Home | Apply Online | Request More Information | Course of Study | Faculty | Speakers |
Why Study History or Political Science? | Internship Opportunities | Student Publications | Financial Assistance | FAQ | Contact Us

Master of American History and Government:  Home | About | Admission | Schedule of Courses | Course Registration | Tuition | Faculty | Request More Information

TeachingAmericanHistory.org:  Home | Saturday Seminars | Summer Institutes | Partner on a Teaching American History Grant | Historical Documents Library | Audio Lectures and Discussions | Constitutional Convention | Ratification of the Constitution

Presidential Academy for American History and Civics:  Home | About the Program | Documents and Texts | Faculty | Itinerary | Application

Congressional Academy for American History and Civics:  Home | About the Program | Documents and Texts | Faculty | Itinerary | Application

Podcasts:  Home | What's a Podcast? | Subscribe

No Left Turns Blog  Home | Archive | Postings by Author | Comments by Our Readers | What's in a Name? | RSS Site Feed

Publications:  Home | Editorials | On Principle | Right from the Center | Dialogues | Books | Monographs |
Ashbrook Statesmanship Theses | Res Publica | Publication Request Form | Publications by Subject

Events:  Home | John M. Ashbrook Memorial Dinner | Major Issues Lecture Series | Colloquium |
Van Meter Scholarship Luncheon | Conferences and Special Events | Calendar of Events | On-Line Speeches (RealAudio)

About Us:  Home | Board of Advisors | Staff | Who Was John M. Ashbrook | Support the Ashbrook Center |
Map and Directions

 

The Ashbrook Center is a townhall.com Member Organization.

Verizon Foundation
Support for ashbrook.org is provided by the Verizon Foundation.


John M. Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs
Ashland University
401 College Avenue | Ashland, Ohio 44805
(419) 289-5411  |   (877) 289-5411 (Toll Free)