Click Here to Go to the Ashbrook Center's Homepage

Subscribe to Our Email Update
 
SEARCH
 

Home



Support the Ashbrook Center



Subscribe to Our E-Mail Update




No Left Turns:
The Ashbrook
Center Blog







Ashbrook Scholar Program

Master of American History and Government




Book of the Week:
The People of the Book: Philosemitism in England, From Cromwell to Churchill
by Gertrude Himmelfarb




  Podcasts



Other Ashbrook
Web Sites:


AshbrookScholar.org



mahg.ashland.edu



TeachingAmerican
History.org


Document Library

Constitutional Convention

The American Founding



Presidential
Academy.org




Congressional
Academy.org




Letters from
an Ohio Farmer




VindicatingThe
Founders.com




ClassicsOf
Strategy.com

Conflict and Contradictions in Kosovo
Editorial
September 1999

by: David Tucker


Things are not going well in Kosovo. During their recent visits there our new Ambassador to the United Nations, Richard Holbrooke, and Democratic Senators Joseph Biden of Delaware and Patrick Leahy of Vermont, saw this at first hand.

There were two things we did not want to happen in Kosovo: ethnic slaughter and the emergence of an Albanian dominated Kosovo independent of Serbia, the country in which Kosovo has been a province. The slaughter has already occurred and continues. Now it is Albanians killing and forcing Serbs to flee. The Albanians also look set on establishing an independent Kosovo. Once independent, the Albanians in Kosovo may form an alliance with Albania or become a magnet for the Albanians in neighboring Macedonia, encouraging them to separate from Macedonia and join their brethren in Kosovo. This would rip apart another Balkan country and risk more ethnic violence and slaughter.

This unhappy situation is the result of a long train of miscalculations on the part of the United States and its European allies. But for the United States, at least, there is a deeper explanation for the problems we continue to have in the Balkans. We are acting on two principles fundamental to our foreign policy—two principles which, unfortunately, contradict each other. If we achieve goals consistent with one, we cannot achieve goals consistent with the other. Worse, in Kosovo, the contradiction between these principles may keep us directly in the middle between the two warring sides.

The first principle is the right of national self-determination. Our constitution begins with the words “We the people.” This is an expression of our deeply held opinion that people have the right to choose their own government.

The second principle fundamental to our foreign policy is that the recognized borders of countries should not change. We believe that this principle helps keep international politics peaceful and orderly. This principle is especially important in areas like the Balkans, in which people of different ethnic groups are mixed together. If borders can change, there will be no end of conflict as countries are ripped apart by the desire of ethnic groups divided by borders to unite within one common border.

These two principles are fine in themselves. But what happens if a people exercises its right of national self-determination by trying to separate itself and the land it occupies from the country where it has previously resided to form its own country or join with another? Then our two principles are in conflict.

In Kosovo, this has meant that we have told the Serbs that the Albanians have a right to determine their own political life, while we have told the Albanians that they must remain part of Serbia. By giving each antagonist only part of what it wants, we are encouraging each to continue fighting. Worse, in the midst of this fight that our adherence to contradictory principles aggravates, we have now dropped our troops and those of our allies as peacekeepers. We are encouraging conflict and trying to make peace at the same time. We must hope that this contradictory policy does not lead to more than the few casualties among the peacekeepers that have already occurred.

In the future, how can we avoid such contradictions? We must recognize that foreign policy is not a means of doing good for others. It is a means of doing good for ourselves, while harming others as little as possible. We enjoy the right of choosing our own government, but this does not mean that we have to guarantee others’ right to do the same. In some cases, we may be able to help people enjoy this right without hurting ourselves or them. In other cases, probably the majority of cases, insisting that other peoples have the right to choose their political way of life will probably do more harm than good. Kosovo is such a case. We are bound to encounter others in the years to come.

David Tucker is an adjunct fellow at the Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs at Ashland University and an Associate Professor at the United States Naval Postgraduate School.



 


Printer-Friendly Version

Upcoming Events

Ashbrook Center in Florida
Monday, February 13

Pat Tiberi on the American Dream
Tuesday, February 21

Reed Browning on the War of Austrian Succession
Friday, February 24

David Tucker on Fear and Freedom
Friday, March 23

Terrence Moore on Education Reform
Friday, April 20


Recent Publications


Rick Santorum and Limited Government by Andrew E. Busch

Who Owns the Bard? by Ellen Tucker

Clarence Thomas and the Wisdom of the Founding by Ken Masugi

U.S. Headed in the Right Direction by Peter W. Schramm

Deficits and Cultural Politics by David Marion

America’s Future in New Europe by Justin Paulette

Our Discussion of Islam by David Foster

The Tea Party and Nullification by Michael Sabo

Drama Queens: Elizabeth Taylor, Camille Paglia, and the Purposes of Female Power by Julie Ponzi

Honoring Ronald Reagan by Peter W. Schramm

Realigning American Politics: Do We Still Hold These Truths? by Matthew Spalding

Reagan’s Inherent Goodness Made Him One of the Great Presidents by Peter W. Schramm

Reagan the Radical by Stephen Knott

Huck Finn and the Constitution by David Foster

Free Speech for Plutocrats: One Year Later by David Forte


Audio Archive


Ramesh Ponnuru on Obamanomics (2011)

Gordon Lloyd on Political Economy (2011)

Steven Hayward on the Health of Capitalism in America (2011)

Rich Lowry on American Exceptionalism (2011)

Mackubin T. Owens on Civil-Military Relations (2011)

Christopher Burkett on James Madison (2011)

John Boehner (2011)

Jonah Goldberg on Liberalism (2010)

Mitt Romney (2010)

John Kasich on the Future of Ohio (2009)

Conference on the Presidency and the Courts featuring President George W. Bush (2008)

Jeb Bush on America’s Promise (2008)

Glenn Beck on Militant Islam (2006)

Karl Rove on Conservatism (2005)

James McPherson on the Battle of Antietam (2005)

David Hackett Fischer on Liberty and Freedom (2004)

William Bennett on the Politics of War (2004)

Edwin Meese on Homeland Security (2003)

Barbara Bush on CSPAN (2003)

Victor Davis Hanson on Terrorism (2003)

Benjamin Netanyahu on Attaining Peace (2002)

Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court (1999)

Margaret Thatcher on Ronald Reagan and Freedom (1993)

Dick Cheney on American Foreign Policy (1991)

Ronald Reagan on John Ashbrook (1983)

  Real Logo
Visit our archive of over 200 other Ashbrook speeches at
audio.ashbrook.org or subscribe to our
Events Podcast.








ASHBROOK SCHOLAR PROGRAM | MASTER OF AMERICAN HISTORY AND GOVERNMENT |
PUBLICATIONS | EVENTS | PODCASTS | NO LEFT TURNS BLOG | AUDIO ARCHIVE | DONATE | ABOUT US

 

Ashbrook Scholar Program:  Home | Apply Online | Request More Information | Course of Study | Faculty | Speakers |
Why Study History or Political Science? | Internship Opportunities | Student Publications | Financial Assistance | FAQ | Contact Us

Master of American History and Government:  Home | About | Admission | Schedule of Courses | Course Registration | Tuition | Faculty | Request More Information

TeachingAmericanHistory.org:  Home | Saturday Seminars | Summer Institutes | Partner on a Teaching American History Grant | Historical Documents Library | Audio Lectures and Discussions | Constitutional Convention | Ratification of the Constitution

Presidential Academy for American History and Civics:  Home | About the Program | Documents and Texts | Faculty | Itinerary | Application

Congressional Academy for American History and Civics:  Home | About the Program | Documents and Texts | Faculty | Itinerary | Application

Podcasts:  Home | What's a Podcast? | Subscribe

No Left Turns Blog  Home | Archive | Postings by Author | Comments by Our Readers | What's in a Name? | RSS Site Feed

Publications:  Home | Editorials | On Principle | Right from the Center | Dialogues | Books | Monographs |
Ashbrook Statesmanship Theses | Res Publica | Publication Request Form | Publications by Subject

Events:  Home | John M. Ashbrook Memorial Dinner | Major Issues Lecture Series | Colloquium |
Van Meter Scholarship Luncheon | Conferences and Special Events | Calendar of Events | On-Line Speeches (RealAudio)

About Us:  Home | Board of Advisors | Staff | Who Was John M. Ashbrook | Support the Ashbrook Center |
Map and Directions

 

Verizon Foundation
Support for ashbrook.org is provided by the Verizon Foundation.


John M. Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs
Ashland University
401 College Avenue | Ashland, Ohio 44805
(419) 289-5411  |   (877) 289-5411 (Toll Free)