Click Here to Go to the Ashbrook Center's Homepage

Subscribe to Our Email Update
 



No Left Turns
Home




Donate to the Ashbrook Center



Ashbrook Home



  RSS Site Feed



  Ashbrook
Podcasts


Podcast Index

What's a Podcast?

Peter Schramm's "You Americans"

Ashbrook Events

Teaching American History







-->
Enter Monthly Drawing for the
No Left Turns Mug




Comments by
Our Readers




Recommend
No Left Turns
to Your Friends




No Left Turns:
What's in a Name?




Postings 
by Author


Peter Schramm

Joe Knippenberg

Steven Hayward

Peter Lawler

John Moser

Julie Ponzi

William Voegeli

Richard Adams

Ken Thomas

Mackubin T. Owens

Patrick Garrity

Robert Alt

David Tucker

Lucas Morel

Nathaniel Stewart

Mickey Craig

Eric Claeys

Jeff Sikkenga

John C. Eastman

R.J. Pestritto

Larry Obhof

Glenn Sheller

David Foster



No Left Turns
Archive


 

Other Ashbrook 
Web Sites 


Ashbrook Center



Ashbrook Scholar Program



Social Studies
Teacher Seminars






Congressional Academy for American History and Civics





Presidential Academy for American History and Civics





Master of American History and Government



VindicatingThe Founders.com



Classics of Strategy and Diplomacy





American Speeches, Letters, and Documents
On-Line Library






Constitutional
Convention


Federalist-
Antifederalist
Debate


Ratification of
the Constitution


Founding
Political Parties


 

Our Favorite 
Bloggers 


Best of the Web Today

NRO Corner

How Appealing

The Volokh Conspiracy

Hugh Hewitt

RealClearPolitics

InstaPundit

Arma Virumque

Power Line

Little Green Footballs

Booker Rising

Belmont Club

Anchor Rising

No-Pasaran


 


 

Return to the Latest on No Left Turns

Condi Rice for Higher Office

Dr. Schramm has suggested in the past that Condi Rice replace Dick Cheney as the Vice Presidential Candidate in 2004. I remain unpersuaded for 2004 but I am now perfectly happy to have a Cheney-Rice ticket in 2008. Read Condoleeza Rice’s powerful speech yesterday at the National Prayer Breakfast:

Remarks by National Security Advisor Dr. Condoleezza Rice
at the National Prayer Breakfast
Washington Hilton Hotel
Washington, D.C.
February 6, 2003

I am greatly honored by the invitation to speak here this morning. It is a day when official Washington gathers not as Republicans or Democrats; not as conservatives or liberals; nor as Christians, Jews, or Muslims. Rather, we are gathered as a fellowship of the faithful who share a love of God and who embrace God’s will and ways - even in moments of pain and loss, like right now, when those ways seem so mysterious to us. Today, our Nation’s thoughts are with the seven brave souls taken from us five mornings ago. We pray that in losing their mortal lives they have found life eternal in His care.

I approach the honor of addressing you with a deep sense of humility. I am not a member of any clergy. I am, however, the daughter, the granddaughter and, indeed, the niece, of ordained Presbyterian ministers. So in some ways this occasion feels very familiar to me.

Sundays in my family meant church. It was the center of our lives. In segregated black Birmingham of the late 1950s and early 1960s, the church was not just a place of worship; it was the social and civic center of our community.

Throughout my life I have never doubted the existence of God, but, like most people, I have had some ups and downs in practicing my faith. After I moved to California in 1981 to join the faculty at Stanford, there were a lot of years when I was not attending church regularly. I was traveling a great deal, always in a different time zone, and going to church too often fell by the wayside.

Then something happened that I will always remember. One Sunday morning I was approached at the supermarket by a man buying some things for his church picnic. He asked me, "Do you play the piano by any chance?" I said, "Yes." And he said his congregation was looking for someone to play the piano at their church. It was a small African-American church in the center of Palo Alto and I started playing there every Sunday. And I thought to myself, "My goodness, God has a long reach - all the way to a Lucky’s Supermarket in the spice section on a Sunday morning."

The only problem was, it was a Baptist church and I don’t play gospel very well, unlike our great Attorney General John Ashcroft. I play Brahms. At this church the minister would start with a song and the musicians had to pick it up. I had no idea what I was doing. So I called my mother, who had played for Baptist churches, to ask her for advice. She said, "Honey, just play in C and they’ll come back to you." And that’s true. If you play in C, the foundational key in music, people will come back. Perhaps God plays in C, and that’s why we always seem to find our way back to Him, sometimes in spite of ourselves.

Looking back on the years since I found my way back, it is hard for me to imagine my life without a strong and active faith. Faith is what gives me comfort, and humility, and hope . even through the darkest hours. Like many people - here and abroad - I have turned to God and prayer more and more this past year and a half, including this past Saturday morning. Terror and tragedy have made us more aware of our vulnerability and our own mortality. We are living through a time of testing and consequence - and praying that our wisdom and will are equal to the work before us. And it is at times like these that we are reminded of a paradox, that it is a privilege to struggle. A privilege to struggle for what is right and true. A privilege to struggle for freedom over tyranny. A privilege, even, to struggle with the most difficult and profound moral choices.

American slaves used to sing, "Nobody knows the trouble I’ve seen - Glory Hallelujah!" Growing up, I would often wonder at the seeming contradiction contained in this line. But as I grew older, I came to learn that there is no contradiction at all.

I believe this same message is found in the Bible in Romans 5, where we are told to "rejoice in our sufferings, knowing that suffering produces endurance, and endurance produces character, and character produces hope, and hope does not disappoint us, because God’s love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit which has been given to us."

For me, this message has two lessons.

First, there is the lesson that only through struggle do we realize the depths of our resilience and understand that the hardest of blows can be survived and overcome. Too often when all is well, we slip into the false joy and satisfaction of the material and a complacent pride and faith in ourselves. Yet it is through struggle that we find redemption and self-knowledge. In this sense it is a privilege to struggle because it frees one from the idea that the human spirit is fragile, like a house of cards, or that human strength is fleeting.

We see this theme in illustrated in sacred texts the world over. In the Book of Job, God tests Job’s faith by taking from him everything that he cherishes—his wealth, his health, and his family. Early in his trials, one of Job’s friends counsels him to be patient, saying, "Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth; therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty: For he maketh sore, and bindeth up: he woundeth, and his hands make whole ... In famine he shall redeem thee from death; and in war from the power of the sword ... And thou shalt know that thy tabernacle shall be in peace ..." In the end, Job’s sufferings strengthen his faith and, we are told, he is rewarded with "twice as much as he had before" and he lived "a hundred and forty years" until he was "old and full of days." We learn in times of personal struggle - the loss of a loved one, illness, or turmoil - that there is a peace that passeth understanding. When our intellect is unequal to the task - the spirit takes over, finding peace in the midst of pain is the true fulfillment of one’s humanity.

Struggle doesn’t just strengthen us to survive hard times - it is also the key foundation for true optimism and accomplishment. Indeed, personal achievement without struggle somehow feels incomplete and hollow. It is true too for human kind - because nothing of lasting value has ever been achieved without sacrifice.

There is a second, more important, lesson to be learned from struggle and suffering is that we can use the strength it gives us for the good of others. Nothing good is born of personal struggle if it is used to fuel one ’s sense of entitlement, or superiority to those who we perceive to have struggled less than we. Everyone in this room has been blessed, and I am sure we all know that it is dangerous to think about the hand that one has been dealt relative to others if it ends in questioning why someone else has more. It is, on the other hand, sobering and humbling to think about one’s blessings and to ask why you have been given so much when others have so little.

Our goal must not be to get through a struggle so that others can congratulate us on our resilience, nor is it to dwell on struggle as a badge of honor.

Perhaps this is why in describing his personal struggle, the Apostle Paul felt it necessary to say to the Philippians, "Forgetting those things that are behind and reaching forward to those things which are ahead . I press toward the goal for the price of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus." We find a similar idea in the Talmud, which says "one should only pray in a house that has windows" - in order that we may remember the outside world. And in the Hadith, we find Muhammad saying: "No one of you is a believer until he desires for his brother that which he desires for himself."

But to direct the energies from our struggles toward the good of others, we must first let go of the pain, and the bad memories, and the sense of unfairness—of "Why me?" - that inevitably accompany deep personal turmoil.

I believe this lesson applies not only to individuals, but to nations. America emerged from the losses of September 11th as a nation that is not only stronger, but hopefully better and more generous. Tragedy made us appreciate our freedom more - and more conscious of the fact that God gives all people, everywhere, the right to be free. It made us more thankful for our own prosperity, for life, and health - and more aware that all people, everywhere deserve the opportunity to build a better future.

It prompted us to cultivate what the President has called "the habit of service" to others so that the "gathering momentum of millions of acts of kindness" may bring hope to people in desperate need. And perhaps most importantly, September 11th reminded us of our heritage as a tolerant nation; one that welcomes people of all faiths, or no faith at all.

Now, as our Nation once again deals with great loss, with fears and uncertainties, let us once again recommit ourselves to those values which define us. Let us renew our quest for understanding the natural world and all the heavens which God has made. Let us renew our commitment to standing for life, and liberty, and peace for all people. Let us renew our commitment to working with all nations to conquer want, and hunger, and disease in every corner of the globe. Let us accept our responsibility to defend the freedom which we are so privileged to enjoy.

If terror and tragedy spur us to rediscover and strengthen these commitments, then we can truly say that some good has come from great loss. And in all the trials that may lie ahead, we will carry these commitments close to our heart so we may leave a better world for those who follow. This is our prayer for our Nation and our people. This is our prayer for all Nations and all peoples. Lord, hear our prayer.



Posted by Mickey Craig  |  Link to this Entry  |  Comments [650]  |  2/7/2003  9:46 AM


Press Coverage of Columbia

Jonah Goldberg has a thoughtful piece in today’s Wall Street Journal on how cable TV covered the Columbia disaster. Note especially, his comments on CNN and FOX. He has a point, FOX better get on the ball. And there are a few pregnant lines, like quoting Ambrose Bierce to the effect that war is God’s way of teaching Americans geography. We now know where Kandahar is (a city by the way, like many others in Afghanistan, named after Alexander the Great). A one coffee read.  

Posted by Peter Schramm  |  Link to this Entry  |  Comments  |  2/7/2003  9:07 AM


Polls After the Powell Speech

Here is a WaPo/ABC poll, and one from CNN/USA Today/Gallup on the effects of Powell’s speech to the Security Council. They are oddly confusing, if not contradictory. Yet, Oxblog makes sense of them, in a few paragraphs. Here are a few good lines from Oxblog, the rest is also worth reading.

"What neither Gallup nor a WaPo storyabout the polls points out is how remarkable it is that both Bush’s State of the Union speech and Powell’s UN address significantly increased support for an invasion. This sort of double-bounce has almost no historical precedents."



Posted by Peter Schramm  |  Link to this Entry  |  Comments [2]  |  2/7/2003  8:40 AM


Anti-War Activists Frustrated

A reader chastized me for not pointing you to this silly and biased article from Reuters that claims that Bush is ignoring the so-called peace movement and they are frustrated. Well, the problem is that it is a non-story, full of holes, and dreary. The only truth in the story is that these activists (why are people who hate America called that?) are frustrated. Good, let them be frustrated. A deeper analysis isn’t worth our time. No coffee with this one. Skim it.

Posted by Peter Schramm  |  Link to this Entry  |  Comments [2]  |  2/6/2003  4:13 PM


Student Sues Over Grade

This is too much. A high school senior in Michigan says he earned an A+ rather than an A in a class taken in intermediate school and that the grade should be changed. If it is, he is likely to become the valedictorian. So he is suing the principal, school board, etc. By the way, the class he is concerned about was one in which he "worked as a paralegal in his mother’s law office." I think it’s his mother he ought to be suing. Isn’t this fun?

Posted by Peter Schramm  |  Link to this Entry  |  Comments  |  2/6/2003  3:59 PM


More on Old Europe vs. New Europe

Pejman led me to this article by Nick Schultz on the respective populations of the Old and New Europe; you should be encouraged by it. Here is the punch line:

"The fact remains that 100 million more Europeans, speaking through their elected representatives, stand with the United States than stand opposed to the United States. The difference represents twice the population of France and is a quarter more than the population of Germany. It is France and Germany that are not only in a minority but are in a relatively small minority."

Oh yes, one more thing, while we are on the subject of Europe old and new: Turkey will allow the US to use bases in case of need. This needs pointing to because of the continual pounding by CBS, NBC, ABC, et al, that after all, our efforts are not multilateral; please, wake up and smell the Iraqi coffee brewing. Make enough to last a few weeks.  

Posted by Peter Schramm  |  Link to this Entry  |  Comments [2]  |  2/6/2003  3:29 PM


Let’s Quit the UN?

There is a logic to this Mark Steyn piece that is hard to argue against. He wants us to quit the U.N.

Posted by Peter Schramm  |  Link to this Entry  |  Comments [1]  |  2/6/2003  3:27 PM


Iraq Matters, Post Powell

It seems to me that the Powell speech has had the effect that was needed, note this excellent WaPo editorial on the matter. Also note that ten other European countries (to be added to the eight of a week ago) are coming in an our side. I think the French have begun to move in our direction (but see this good piece by Andrew Sullivan from a few days ago, and this by Stephen Hays on the French position); in the end they will not be held responsible for making the UN irrelevant. Also note the hard line that the inspectors are taking toward Iraq: The inspectors have claimed to Blair that Iraq is not cooperating. This means that their report of next week will be the end. And here is an excellent piece from George Will on what it all means and how the "French have retreated into incoherence." And conclude your reading with this nice short piece outlining how technological advancements of the last dozen years have transformed the US military. You might as well start paying attention to the hardware and strategy since we will be at war by early March (unless Saddam abdicates or is overthrown), and that war, I still maintain, will be under UN auspices.

Posted by Peter Schramm  |  Link to this Entry  |  Comments [1]  |  2/6/2003  9:44 AM


Iraq: The War Debate

The Council of Foreign Relations is sponsoring a debate on Iraq tonight at 6 P.M. (ET). The participants will be Bill Kristol and Max Boot vs. John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt. It should be fun. If you have the time, you can see it and hear it here in a web-cast.

Posted by Peter Schramm  |  Link to this Entry  |  Comments  |  2/5/2003  5:03 PM


Confederate Flag in South Carolina

It seems to be back as an issue, but now it is one for the Democratic candidates to deal with. Amusing double talk from all of them. Worth two sips of coffee.  

Posted by Peter Schramm  |  Link to this Entry  |  Comments [1]  |  2/5/2003  3:38 PM


Happy Birthday Ronald Reagan!

Ronald Reagan will be 92 years old tomorrow. Steve Hayward celebrates the man and his birthday by remining us how he had been underestimated, and how he is being rehabilitated, even among some liberals. A good man, a fine president. It was an honor to work in his administration. Happy Birthday, Mr. President.

Posted by Peter Schramm  |  Link to this Entry  |  Comments [1]  |  2/5/2003  3:04 PM


Powell’s Speech

I was asked to provide an immediate reaction to Sec. Powell’s speech by NRO. My piece is here

Posted by Mackubin T. Owens  |  Link to this Entry  |  Comments [57]  |  2/5/2003  2:42 PM


Our Friends the French

I’m sorry to be so far behind the power curve, but I see we are making fun of the French and I jsut can’t resist a contribution. This was related to me not too long ago by a Brit: the French killed more Germans a couple of years ago when one of their Concordes crashed than they did during all of World War II.

Posted by Mackubin T. Owens  |  Link to this Entry  |  Comments [236]  |  2/5/2003  1:47 PM


Bill Clinton and the Demos

Howard Kurtz’s piece in today’s WaPo has some interesting reflections on Clinton’s continued presence and effect on Democratic presidential politics. He quotes extensively from William Greider’s article in The Nation bemoaning the fact that Clinton continues to meddle in party affairs. The fact that he still has some standing is a reflection of not only his political capacities, but also of the fact that the other Demo candidates have no authority or standing. This is more proof that the 2004 election for Bill is a throwaway and that the smart Demos will be focusing on 2008; and that’s where Hillary (and Bill) really comes in. Follow the links in the article. Worth a couple of coffees as light fun after contemplating war.    

Posted by Peter Schramm  |  Link to this Entry  |  Comments [1]  |  2/5/2003  1:17 PM


France’s Elegant Retreat

I just heard the French foreign minister give a "diplomatic" talk that could be interpreted in a number of different ways; so, their mission is accomplished, war is not ruled out but really it would be best to strengthen the inspection regime, etc. As Bill Kristol said on FOX, the French foreign minister began an "elegant retreat." They have moved in our direction and the Germans (who are not relevant in any case, they have no veto) are now watching the French move away from them, trying to get off of the limb. The great alliance announce a few weeks ago is about to end.

Posted by Peter Schramm  |  Link to this Entry  |  Comments [2]  |  2/5/2003  12:52 PM


Colin Powell’s Security Council Speech

I thought the speech was excellent, detailed, and serious. It seems to me that case is made and it is unimpeachable. The only thing that actually surprised me was his reference to the UN becoming irrelevant if it ignores his proof. Good. I was also pleased to see him elaborate some on the connections between Iraq terrorists. You might also want to look at this very interesting Jeffrey Goldberg article in the current issue of The New Yorker on the connection betwen Al Qaeda and Iraq. It is now perfectly obvious to all that Iraq will have to be dealth with, and it will be. The only question is whether or not it will be done under UN auspices. The French have some decisions to make. I think they will go along with us, or forever be known as the country that made the UN irrelevant. They can’t afford that, so they will agree, in the end. Here is the WaPo’s running transcript of the speech; it is not yet on the State Department site.

Posted by Peter Schramm  |  Link to this Entry  |  Comments  |  2/5/2003  12:13 PM


Anti-American Studies

TNR Online has a great review essay by Alan Wolfe on how American Studies programs have become havens for those who most despise America and all that it stands for. Here’s a quote:

"American studies still exists as an academic discipline. If anything, it can be found in far more colleges and universities now than during the 1960s, and it attracts significant numbers of graduate students, and its practitioners publish innumerable books and articles. Yet the third generation and the fourth generation of scholars in the field not only reject the writers who gave life to the discipline, they have also developed a hatred for America so visceral that it makes one wonder why they bother studying America at all."

Posted by John Moser  |  Link to this Entry  |  Comments  |  2/5/2003  10:09 AM


WaPo: Don’t Filibuster Estrada

WaPo has a fine editorial today in which it denounces the Ralph Neas led Democratic plans to filibuster Estrada. It is worth quoting at length:

With the Estrada nomination due to come to the Senate floor today, [Democratic Senators] are contemplating a dramatic escalation of the judicial nomination wars. They should stand down. Mr. Estrada, who is well qualified for the bench, should not be a tough case for confirmation. Democrats who disagree may vote against him. They should not deny him a vote. . . . But a world in which filibusters serve as an active instrument of nomination politics is not one either party should want. Mr. Estrada’s nomination in no way justifies a filibuster.
A few more words on filibusters. On the Capitol Hill, most seasoned politicians understand that the power of the filibuster is in the threat. Actually using a filibuster carries risk. If you are unsuccessful in garnering the votes necessary to filibuster, then the next time you threaten to use the meneuver the threat will be viewed as toothless. If you are successful, then the threat becomes more powerful, however you open yourself up to a public backlash for being obstructionist.

Leahy and his cohorts have put themselves in a tough place. They have wedded themselves to special interests who are so outside the mainstream of the American public that they speak about "judicial armageddon," and therefore the Democratic leadership somehow feel obliged to charge the proverbial "filibuster" windmill. But doing so comes at great cost. Many Democrats will feel uncomfortable about voting against a Hispanic nominee for no better reason than that he may be a potential Supreme Court nominee. Others may worry about being labeled an obstructionist Congress. Others still may even have questions about whether this is an appropriate exercise of the Senate’s constitutional duty of "advice and consent." All of these concerns are justified.

Which leaves but one conclusion: bring on the vote.

Posted by Robert Alt  |  Link to this Entry  |  Comments [250]  |  2/5/2003  8:08 AM


Houston Memorial Service

Here is the President’s remarks at the Memorial Service in honor of the crew of the Columbia.

Posted by Peter Schramm  |  Link to this Entry  |  Comments  |  2/4/2003  4:23 PM


Racial Preferences

Stuart Taylor does a job on racial preferences in this National Journal article called, "Do We Want Another 100 Years of Racial Preferences?" And TNR explains why politicians love affirmative action.

Posted by Peter Schramm  |  Link to this Entry  |  Comments [3]  |  2/4/2003  3:46 PM


Blair--Chirac Meeting Over

It is being reported that France was not persuaded by Blair regarding Iraq in the meeting just concluded. Dick Morris has a pretty good brief on what the French policy toward Iraq has been during the last decade. He also thinks that in the end the French will come around. And Colin Powell is preparing to brief the UN Security Council tomorrow.

Posted by Peter Schramm  |  Link to this Entry  |  Comments  |  2/4/2003  3:26 PM






ASHBROOK SCHOLAR PROGRAM | MASTER OF AMERICAN HISTORY AND GOVERNMENT |
PUBLICATIONS | EVENTS | PODCASTS | NO LEFT TURNS BLOG | AUDIO ARCHIVE | DONATE | ABOUT US

 

Ashbrook Scholar Program:  Home | Apply Online | Request More Information | Course of Study | Faculty | Speakers |
Why Study History or Political Science? | Internship Opportunities | Student Publications | Financial Assistance | FAQ | Contact Us

Master of American History and Government:  Home | About | Admission | Schedule of Courses | Course Registration | Tuition | Faculty | Request More Information

TeachingAmericanHistory.org:  Home | Saturday Seminars | Summer Institutes | Partner on a Teaching American History Grant | Historical Documents Library | Audio Lectures and Discussions | Constitutional Convention | Ratification of the Constitution

Congressional Academy for American History and Civics:  Home | About the Program | Documents and Texts | Faculty | Itinerary | Application

Presidential Academy for American History and Civics:  Home | About the Program | Documents and Texts | Faculty | Itinerary | Application

Podcasts:  Home | What's a Podcast? | Subscribe

No Left Turns Blog  Home | Archive | Postings by Author | Comments by Our Readers | What's in a Name? | RSS Site Feed

Publications:  Home | Editorials | On Principle | Right from the Center | Dialogues | Books | Monographs |
Ashbrook Statesmanship Theses | Res Publica | Publication Request Form | Publications by Subject

Events:  Home | John M. Ashbrook Memorial Dinner | Major Issues Lecture Series | Colloquium |
Van Meter Scholarship Luncheon | Conferences and Special Events | Calendar of Events | On-Line Speeches (RealAudio)

About Us:  Home | Board of Advisors | Staff | Who Was John M. Ashbrook | Donate to the Ashbrook Center |
Map and Directions

 

The Ashbrook Center is a townhall.com Member Organization.

Verizon Foundation
Support for ashbrook.org is provided by the Verizon Foundation.


John M. Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs
Ashland University
401 College Avenue | Ashland, Ohio 44805
(419) 289-5411  |   (877) 289-5411 (Toll Free)